Case Digest: Serrano vs Gallant Maritime Services (2009)

Whether or not the subject clause violates Section 10, Article III of the Constitution on non-impairment of contracts?

Case Digests and Doctrines for IP Law Introduction

1. PEARL & DEAN vs. SHOEMART, INC. [G.R. No. 148222. August 15, 2003] CORONA, J (RTC- respondent shoemart liable for infringement) (CA- decision was reversed means not liable) (SC- certiorari) FACTS: Pearl & Dean was able to acquire copyrights over the designs of the display units called “light boxes”. In 1988, their trademark application for “Poster... Continue Reading →

Create a website or blog at WordPress.com

Up ↑